|
OK, I'll byte.... I mean bite. I'm probably
sitting behind my PC too much as I am studying to get my
A+ certification -- which takes presidence over
things like working on my hobby car.<br><br>I will state
though that I am having to put some of my study time off
to finish building my engine -- 'cause of changing
abodes. Its easier to push forward on building the engine
and moving it as a unit, verses moving boxes and
boxes of parts and having to bring some of these parts
back and forth to/from the area I'm currently at --
don't ask, its more info than you want to know and it
gets confusing.<br><br>With biting at GoRetro's charge
of making statement about our projects, please
coment on this..... My plan with my car is to make a rig
that has better than stock get-up-and-go and is more
fuel efficent. I'm not interested in making a
high-tech racing machine. My plans at present for improving
the performance and efficency are the 40-over ground
cyllinders, getting a Webber down or Mukuni side, and working
over the exhaust including a headder. I was originally
thinking of including a stage 1 or 2 cam and a performance
ignition, and having the applicable engine parts
ballanced...... right now I'm told by a mechanic buddy that I
don't need to go w/ the cam, ignition or ballancing
which will help to keep the over all cost of my project
down, as I so wish to do.<br><br>Whats the thought on
this -- to ballance or not to ballance? I'm told that
there isn't really much that can be done or to worry
about w/ my 20R. I also understand that the stock
ignitions were pretty good.... but between the stock
ignition and cam, should I go w/ those or for what I'm
looking to do w/ my project, would you folks suggest that
I would be happier w/ them? At very least, I know
that I can always add them later -- even if it is just
to amuse myself w/ added tricks & toys to my car --
since they are bolt on parts.
|