|
  |
Rocket scientist needed |
|
|
|
|
Oct 30 2000, 11:39 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
Perhaps one of you good-looking, brainy,
engineer, math wiz, nerd types can help me with this
semi-serious question: Approximately how much gasoline (87
octane) is one of the Prius' "50 watt hour" little yellow
"PacMan stars" equivalent to?<br><br>Also, it it true
that one 50 WH star is approx. equal to running the
stock stereo at full blast for say, 5 hours or so ...
assuming that the steroe amp is capable of approx. 15
watts RMS total output?<br><br>Along the same lines,
another semi useful comparison would be the ratio of 50WH
stars to running time of the headlights on low
beam.<br><br>Several folks have asked me what the 50 watt hour stars
are equivalent to in terms of _mileage_ or
functionality of the car, and I didn't have any good answers
for them.<br><br>- Peter<br>(Is that the sound of
slide rules I hear?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2000, 12:01 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
I figure each little star represents about an
ounce of gasoline that will go unburned.<br><br>See my
message #369, back in August.<br><br>There are probably
lots of ways to approach this question, undoubtedly
more accurate than my back-of-the-envelope guess. Any
other ideas on how to figure it, and maybe check to see
if I got it close?<br><br> --Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2000, 08:19 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
Re: How much gas is 50Wh equivalent
to?<br><br>The US EPA report on the Japanese Prius states (pg
12) that "Toyota claims that the max power capacity
of the battery pack is 1800Wh which is equal to to
0.238 gallons of gas". Doing the math, this says that
50Wh = 0.1 oz of gas.<br><br>(I did actually do a
little engineering on the Atlas/Centaur rocket early in
my career)<br><br>Chuck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2000, 12:45 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
> Re: How much gas is 50Wh equivalent
to?<br>> The US EPA report on the Japanese Prius states
(pg 12) that "Toyota<br>> claims that the max
power capacity of the battery pack is <br>> 1800Wh
which is equal to to 0.238 gallons of gas". Doing the
math, <br>> this says that 50Wh = 0.1 oz of
gas.<br><br>Have you got the math right? I figure:<br>50 Wh / 1800
Wh = 0.0277 * 0.238 gal = 0.0066 gal = 0.845
ounce<br><br> --Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2000, 12:52 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
I wonder that's equivalent to the raw energy of
gasoline or the actual effect of using that volume of gas
in a car.<br><br>Why? Gasoline engine is only about
11% efficient at best. That means you release 89% of
the gasoline energy in the form of heat.... to the
environment.<br><br>Therefore, instead of 0.845 ounce, it's about 8 ounces of
gasoline in a car.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2000, 01:37 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
> I wonder that's equivalent to the raw energy
of gasoline or the actual<br>> effect of using
that volume of gas in a car.<br><br>Good question. I
think it's the effect of using it in the car.
<br><br>Back in message #369 I assumed 10 horsepower output to
the wheels to push the car down the road at a steady
highway speed, and the 45 mpg EPA highway number for the
gasoline it burns to get that output to the wheels, and
also got about an ounce. <br><br>That also assumes the
regenerated power can be returned to the wheels with 100%
efficiency, which is pretty close to accurate. In fact it's
the whole point of the car.<br><br> --Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2000, 02:24 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
>Re: Have you got the math right? I
figure:<br>>50 Wh / 1800 Wh = 0.0277 * 0.238 gal = 0.0066 gal =
0.845 ounce<br><br>Mike,<br><br>You're correct (no it
wasn't me who caused the last mission to Mars to crash
because of a conversion error). <br><br>Amazing how close
this comes to your message #369 where you predict 50Wh
= 1 oz using a totally different
approach.<br><br>Chuck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2000, 03:56 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
This is great, folks. Keep it coming! This is
exactly the sort of info my captive Prius passengers want
to hear (yeah, right)! No, seriously, I very much
appreciate the info and education.<br><br>Now, what about
the Prius car stereo amplifier and headlight low-beam
questions? How do the Prius' 50 watt hour regenerative
"stars" approximately equate to the power consumption of
the stereo when it's cranked, or to the power
consumption of the low-beams? (I don't know offhand the
actual max/typical power consumption rates of the stereo
or headlights myself, regrets.)<br><br>Is this a
straight forward "watts = watts" sort of comparison, or is
it more of an apples and oranges kinda
thing?<br><br>- Peter<br>(Scary thought: I got "interviewed" by a
reporter from the Oakland [CA] Tribune newspaper who may
be publishing a story on the Prius soon. Of course I
said I absolutely _LOVE_ my Prius! Stay tuned ...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 2000, 01:06 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
Chuck said,<br>> Amazing how close this comes
to your message #369 where you predict<br>> 50Wh
= 1 oz using a totally different
approach.<br><br>Especially amazing considering how many wild a** guesses I
made. Just lucky. I think we must be pretty close to
the real figure.<br><br>So, ee_of_ee, you must have
some real figures on all this....<br><br> --Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2000, 06:35 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
First, I'm not a rocket scientist, just a Prius
nut.<br>Second, gasoline contains 33.4 kWh of energy per
gallon.<br>Third, if we assume that Prius gets 50.1 mpg (it makes
the math easier), that is 750Wh/mile.<br>Fourth, that
is about 350 feet of "free" driving per 50Wh
star.<br>Now the disclaimer, this is not a precise
calculation, just another way to play with numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2000, 08:56 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
Hi ee_of_ee,<br>Thanks for the additional hints
on meaning of 50Wh stars.<br><br>Let me try to add
in some additional complicating factors. Primarily,
the inefficiencies of gas engines and batteries. The
EPA web site lists a lot of ways that the energy of
gasoline becomes heat instead of vehicle motion. Most also
apply to running on Electric (drive train losses,
accessories, etc.), but idle losses can be removed because
Prius ICE doesn't idle often. Braking losses are what
the stars represent, so we don't count them either.
So that leaves 62.4% loss due to engine
inefficiencies. Let's guess with the Prius Atkinson cycle engine
that it's more like 50%, so that gallon of gasoline
with 33.4 kWh only gives us 16.7 kWh of useful
energy.<br><br>Storing electricity in a battery and pulling it back out
again is also not really efficient. I think it loses
about 30% but I've also seen other numbers. So a 50 Wh
star is about 35 Wh of useful energy. That gives us
about 480 stars per gallon or about 3.75 oz. of gas per
star. Hmm, bigger answer than other
methods.<br><br>With the 50% derating for the gas energy, a 50.1 MPG
Prius would use 16700/50.1 = 333 Wh/mile. With the 30%
derating for battery storage, the 35 Wh star would be
about about 550 feet of free driving.<br><br>That poor
guy wanted rocket scientists and all he got was us
(and a lot more confused :-)<br><br>Robert
Snyder<br><br>Your Footage (per Star) May Vary!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2000, 09:01 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
I'm sorry, 480 stars per gallon would be about
3.75 stars per oz., not 3.75 oz. per star, so this
answer was smaller than other methods. I.e. closer to
1/4 oz. per star.<br><br>Isn't this how rocket
scientists make things crash on Mars? Maybe I'm learning how
to be one :-)<br><br>Robert Snyder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2000, 08:51 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
I'm glad to see others can make math errors, too.
<br>As I was waiting to drift off to sleep last night, I
realized I'd made a classic in my post yesterday. In my
attempt to simplify the math I blew it. A Prius at 50.1
mpg is using 667 Wh/mi not 750. So much for easy
math. This also changes the benefit of a 50Wh star to
~396 feet. <br><br>Sorry for the error. I'll be more
careful in the future. I, too, may be responsible for the
Mars crash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2000, 11:10 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 15-June 08
Member No.: 12,106
Drives: Toyota
Location: USA

|
<In my attempt to simplify the math I blew it><br><br>Dont feel bad.
Certain Persidential Candidate(s) made bigger math errors.<br><br>Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Search
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Random Featured Members

Random Featured Members

Similar Topics

Similar Topics
|